About the committee

One body for research-ethics oversight

The Research Ethics Committee is the umbrella body overseeing the ethical review of both human and animal research — under a single chair and secretariat, with two specialist review panels.

Governance model

One committee, two review panels


The Research Ethics Committee (REC) is the umbrella body, chaired by one REC Chair who oversees both subcommittees, ensures consistent policy, signs off on annual reports to the College Dean and Council, and resolves cross-committee or escalated matters.

To preserve the independence of each subcommittee, the Chair does not vote on routine protocol decisions within each panel, but sets standards and arbitrates disputes.

Reporting line

REC Chair → Assistant Dean for Scientific Affairs / Dean → College Council.

College Council / Dean
Oversight authority
REC Chair (Head)
Oversees both tracks
IRB
Human panel
IACUC
Animal panel

A single secretariat serves both panels.

How we stay defensible

Domain-specific decisions


The right reviewers

When a human study is reviewed, the human-panel members carry the decision; for an animal protocol, the veterinarian and animal-use members must be present and voting.

Separate records

Separate protocol logs, distinct review checklists, and independent approval letterheads (IRB vs. IACUC) — even under one committee name.

Audit-ready

The separation stays clear if a journal or international funder audits your approvals, protecting the committee's credibility.

Constitution principles

Rules written into the terms of reference


Odd voting membership

Voting membership is kept odd in each panel to avoid tied votes.

A non-affiliated member

Each panel includes at least one member unaffiliated with the College — a recognized international standard.

Defined quorum

A majority including the required specialist — the layperson for human studies, the veterinarian for animal protocols.

Fixed, staggered terms

Terms of 2–3 years, renewable, with staggered rotation so the committee never loses all institutional memory at once.

Conflict-of-interest recusal

Recusal is mandatory whenever a member is an investigator on a protocol under review.

No approval without the specialist

No protocol is approved without its required specialist present.